My view has changed on this topic over the years. So, as the Sanders lawsuit claimed, based on testimony from the sniper himself (this is not debatable), the sniper had Dylan in his sights while he was in the cafeteria, asked for permission to take a head shot, and was told to "stand down." I used to think this information was being suppressed because of the story they told: snipers knew the shooters were dead hours before the police went in, which is why Dave Sanders died. Okay. Now that I know more about this case that has been uncovered recently?
I think the reason this topic is always suppressed is because the sniper didn't know he was watching a scripted scene. He was ordered to stand down because it wasn't a legitimate situation. And that is likely what came out of his involvement in the "Sanders lawsuit" (made for show) and why he signed an NDA and the Sanders' lawsuit files have been sealed until 2116.
I can clear that up! I never actually said Dylan died by accident. I was presenting a possibility connected to a theory that included exploring the potential of him having been shot by law enforcement that didn't realize it was a staged situation. I don't think Dylan is dead, no. I've had personal contact with the person pretending to be his mother, and she befriended me under false pretenses for some reason... he seems to have brain damage, but it could be an act. But no, I do not think he died.
Keep in mind that I often explore topics and ideas and possibilities that I know aren't true just for the sake of exploring them. It's more about presenting information and possibilities for people to think for themselves, and a lot of people like looking at different angles.
I did see that you messaged me, I only check messages about once a month and I will get to it when I can :)
I really have no idea what happened, but he speaks normally in other videos so I'd guess he's acting. I think a lot of these people have pretend family members because they need to appear normal. Sue doesn't use FB openly, but I bet she has one that nobody knows about.
The benefit to exploring every possibility, even when you don't think it's possible or legit, is that you discover so much along the way, including details that help connect other dots.
When you look at a specific theory, you narrow your focus to look for clues that directly relate, and after 25 years of this, I can say that this is exactly why I figured out so much. The way I found people was by exploring the theories I already figured were bogus. One thing led to another and it's the only reason anyone even knows Eric is alive.
We wouldn't even be having this conversation if I didn't explore that theory in-depth, even though I knew for certain based on the "photos" it was impossible. :)
Exploring that theory caused me to go down a rabbit hole that turned up evidence that Zach was involved in a criminal offense all 3 of them were arrested for, and it wasn't the Jan. incident. And that led to so much more I've yet to post.
The process of researching and investigating things you don't believe or know to be false really does have value. :)
I wish I had answers. From a 3D perspective, it seems like he's acting. The woman pretending to be his mother is likely his "handler" - the person they put in charge of making sure people don't talk or reveal the secrets. However, from a universal perspective, there are only Matrix characters that are real in the sense of being physical, but they are just illusions, ultimately, spun up by this Matrix to make the stories of this world make sense. For those who can see these characters, it is more like an invitation to keep looking at this world we live in to see the underlying truths. They're like fingers pointing at the moon and not the moon itself.
It all came from his social media. Everything that was made public. The only person I've had contact with is the woman pretending to be "Dylan's" mother.
I had always heard about the rooftop snipers and the whole misinformation about it but had no idea there was actual footage of it! Amazing info! It's crazy how others suppress this part of the story so much.
You've said before I believe that perhaps Dylan was the only one that dies that day and completely on accident. Maybe one of the snipers went against orders, created a whole mess, came out in the lawsuit and that's why it's been sealed for another 90 years or so? Several generations that lived it would be long gone to actually complain to government about it.
I just found the videos, too! I'll post those soon.
Yeah, whatever is in those litigation files is definitely something they want kept secret for at least this current generation. Apparently nobody's willing to spill the beans, not even on their death beds.
Really interesting read! The fact that the Sanders case has been sealed when it should be in the public interest is telling. The law belongs to all of us. It should be transparent, especially in a high profile case like this that has been all over the media. And the lack of key witness testimonies, makes it seem like an oversight. Being told to stand down definitely makes no sense either, if it were a genuine scenario.
I have tried to get the FULL Sanders case and I got the runaround. I think all that we can get are the motions that were not sealed and the docket list. Nothing else, all that is part of the 2116 seal!!! (Edited to add I do have the general casefile for the Sanders suit just not anything more than court motions)
It's wild the way we have next to no witness testimony. 11,000 pages of... summaries written by other people (police), we have. :P
Hard agree there on being told to stand down not making sense.
People went to great lengths to prove nobody could see into the library from the outside and therefore no sniper had a view, but the sniper himself said he had a view into the cafeteria. Library was just above. TONS of photos taken from the ground that very day show people visible in the library. And in the Ireland case, a photo was presented by Brian Rohrbough specifically to prove that there was a clear view into the library to prove his point that police knew what was going on inside.
Of course, that was for show, but it's still true, and proves more than his point.
My view has changed on this topic over the years. So, as the Sanders lawsuit claimed, based on testimony from the sniper himself (this is not debatable), the sniper had Dylan in his sights while he was in the cafeteria, asked for permission to take a head shot, and was told to "stand down." I used to think this information was being suppressed because of the story they told: snipers knew the shooters were dead hours before the police went in, which is why Dave Sanders died. Okay. Now that I know more about this case that has been uncovered recently?
I think the reason this topic is always suppressed is because the sniper didn't know he was watching a scripted scene. He was ordered to stand down because it wasn't a legitimate situation. And that is likely what came out of his involvement in the "Sanders lawsuit" (made for show) and why he signed an NDA and the Sanders' lawsuit files have been sealed until 2116.
I can clear that up! I never actually said Dylan died by accident. I was presenting a possibility connected to a theory that included exploring the potential of him having been shot by law enforcement that didn't realize it was a staged situation. I don't think Dylan is dead, no. I've had personal contact with the person pretending to be his mother, and she befriended me under false pretenses for some reason... he seems to have brain damage, but it could be an act. But no, I do not think he died.
Keep in mind that I often explore topics and ideas and possibilities that I know aren't true just for the sake of exploring them. It's more about presenting information and possibilities for people to think for themselves, and a lot of people like looking at different angles.
I did see that you messaged me, I only check messages about once a month and I will get to it when I can :)
I really have no idea what happened, but he speaks normally in other videos so I'd guess he's acting. I think a lot of these people have pretend family members because they need to appear normal. Sue doesn't use FB openly, but I bet she has one that nobody knows about.
The benefit to exploring every possibility, even when you don't think it's possible or legit, is that you discover so much along the way, including details that help connect other dots.
When you look at a specific theory, you narrow your focus to look for clues that directly relate, and after 25 years of this, I can say that this is exactly why I figured out so much. The way I found people was by exploring the theories I already figured were bogus. One thing led to another and it's the only reason anyone even knows Eric is alive.
We wouldn't even be having this conversation if I didn't explore that theory in-depth, even though I knew for certain based on the "photos" it was impossible. :)
Exploring that theory caused me to go down a rabbit hole that turned up evidence that Zach was involved in a criminal offense all 3 of them were arrested for, and it wasn't the Jan. incident. And that led to so much more I've yet to post.
The process of researching and investigating things you don't believe or know to be false really does have value. :)
I wish I had answers. From a 3D perspective, it seems like he's acting. The woman pretending to be his mother is likely his "handler" - the person they put in charge of making sure people don't talk or reveal the secrets. However, from a universal perspective, there are only Matrix characters that are real in the sense of being physical, but they are just illusions, ultimately, spun up by this Matrix to make the stories of this world make sense. For those who can see these characters, it is more like an invitation to keep looking at this world we live in to see the underlying truths. They're like fingers pointing at the moon and not the moon itself.
It all came from his social media. Everything that was made public. The only person I've had contact with is the woman pretending to be "Dylan's" mother.
I had always heard about the rooftop snipers and the whole misinformation about it but had no idea there was actual footage of it! Amazing info! It's crazy how others suppress this part of the story so much.
You've said before I believe that perhaps Dylan was the only one that dies that day and completely on accident. Maybe one of the snipers went against orders, created a whole mess, came out in the lawsuit and that's why it's been sealed for another 90 years or so? Several generations that lived it would be long gone to actually complain to government about it.
I just found the videos, too! I'll post those soon.
Yeah, whatever is in those litigation files is definitely something they want kept secret for at least this current generation. Apparently nobody's willing to spill the beans, not even on their death beds.
Really interesting read! The fact that the Sanders case has been sealed when it should be in the public interest is telling. The law belongs to all of us. It should be transparent, especially in a high profile case like this that has been all over the media. And the lack of key witness testimonies, makes it seem like an oversight. Being told to stand down definitely makes no sense either, if it were a genuine scenario.
Haha nice new profile pic! :)
I have tried to get the FULL Sanders case and I got the runaround. I think all that we can get are the motions that were not sealed and the docket list. Nothing else, all that is part of the 2116 seal!!! (Edited to add I do have the general casefile for the Sanders suit just not anything more than court motions)
It's wild the way we have next to no witness testimony. 11,000 pages of... summaries written by other people (police), we have. :P
Hard agree there on being told to stand down not making sense.
People went to great lengths to prove nobody could see into the library from the outside and therefore no sniper had a view, but the sniper himself said he had a view into the cafeteria. Library was just above. TONS of photos taken from the ground that very day show people visible in the library. And in the Ireland case, a photo was presented by Brian Rohrbough specifically to prove that there was a clear view into the library to prove his point that police knew what was going on inside.
Of course, that was for show, but it's still true, and proves more than his point.
So many contradictions! Its so obvious when something isn’t as it should be :))
The snipers didn't see anyone die IF nobody died...
Very very true!